The influence of agroforestry silviculture on productivity and quality of Canna edulis Ker on private forest land


  • A Sudomo ICRAF
  • A Hani ICRAF



agroforestry, Canna edulis Ker, Manglietia glauca BI, planting space, pruning intensity


The productivity of private forest land by using agroforestry of Canna edulis Ker aims to achieve food security at the smallholder level. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of agroforestry cropping patterns on productivity and quality of Canna edulis Ker tuber on private forest land. The study was conducted in dry area of the private forest land who are administrativelyincluding Tenggerraharja Village area, SukamantriSubdistrict, Ciamis District, West Java Province, Indonesia. The planting of Canna edulis Ker was implemented under the 32 months old Manglieta glauca BI stands. The main plots were three pruning intensity of Manglietia glauca BI stands i.e. P0 (0 % ) , P1 (50%), and P2 (75%). The sub plots were three planting spaces of Manglietia glauca BI, i.e. S1 (2m x 2m), S2 (2m x 3 m), and S3 (3m x 3m). The planting of Canna edulis Ker by monoculture technique was conducted as a comparison. The results showed that the interaction of planting space and pruning intensity gave a significant result on height growth, wet weight and dry weight of plant, wet weight and dry weight of Canna edulis Ker tuber. The growth of Canna edulis Ker that ranged from 181.85 cm (P0S1) to 186.30 cm (P1S1) were higher than the monoculture system on Canna edulis Ker (138.20 cm). The wet weight and dry weight of tuber that ranged from 2089.3 g and 1429.99 g (P2J2) to 3695.5 g and 2678.09 g (P1S2), whreas those in the monoculture system on Canna edulis Ker  were 2363.1 g and 1528.7 g. However, the protein, fiber and carbohydrate contents of P0S1, P1S1, P2S1 treatments were lower than those of the monoculture system on Canna edulis Ker. The planting pattern of agroforestry were able to improve the plant height of Canna edulis Ker tuber but giving less percentage of carbohydrate and protein of tuber than the monoculture.

Author Biographies

A Sudomo, ICRAF





Akhila, H. and Beevy, S. 2011. Morphological and Seed Protein Characterization of The Cultivatedand the Wild Taxa of Sesamum L. (Pedaliaceae). Plant System Evolution 293:65–70.

Anggarwulan, E. Solichatun, Mudyantini, W. 2008. Karakter Fisiologi Kimpul (Xanthosomasa gittifolium (L.) Schott) padaVariasi Naungan dan Ketersediaan Air. Biodiversitas 9: 264-268.

BP3K. 2012. Programa Kehutanan Sukamantri. Balai Penyuluhan Pertanian, Peternakan dan Kehutanan. Sukamantri. Ciamis

Cardoso, D.J., Lacerda, A.E.B., Rosot, M. A. D., Garrastazu, M.C., and Lima, R.T. 2013. Influence of spacing regimes on the development of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in Southern Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 310: 761–769.

Djukri. dan Purwoko, B.S, 2003 . Pengaruh Naungan Paranet Terhadap Sifat Toleransi Tanaman Talas (Colocasia Esculenta (L.) Schott). Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian 10 (2): 17-25

Harmayani. E., Murdiati, A. and Griyaningsih. 2011. Karakteristik Pati Ganyong Sebagai Pembuatan Cookies dan Cendol. Agrotech 31 (4): 37-42..

Hermann, M., Quynh, N.K. and Peters. D. 1998. Reappraisal of Edible Canna as a High-Value Starch Crop in Vietnam. CIP Program Report 1997-98. Lima

Huxley, P. 1999. Tropical Agroforestry.Blackwell Science. United Kingdom.

Lembaga Biologi Nasional. 1977. Umbi-ubian. Proyek Sumberdaya Ekonomi. LBN-LIPI. Bogor.

Lott, J.E., Ong, C.K. and Black, C.R. 2009. Understorey microclimate and crop performance in a Grevillearobusta-based agroforestry system in semi-arid Kenya. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149: 1140–1151.

Magcale-Macandog, D.B., Ranola, F.M.R., Ranola Jr, R F., Ani, P.A.B. and Vidal, N.B. 2010. Enhancing the Food Security of Upland Farming Households through Agroforestry in Claveria, Misamis Oriental, Philippines. Agroforestry System 79:327–342.

Muthuri, C.W., Ong, C.K., Ngumi, V.W., Mati, B.M. 2005. Tree and crop productivity in Grevillea, Alnus and Paulownia-based agroforestry systems in semi-arid Kenya. Forest Ecology and Management 212: 23–39.

Norton, B.W., Wilson, J.R., Shelton, H.M. and Hill, K.D. 1991. The Effect of Shade on Forage Quality. In Forage For Plantation Crop, ACIAR Proc. 32 : 83 – 88.

Ong, C.K., Black, C.R. and Muthuri, C.W., 2006. Modifying forests and agroforestry for improved water productivity in the semi-arid tropics. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science. Nutrition and Natural Resources 65: 1–19.

Rao, M.R., Nair, P.K.R. and Ong, K. 1998. Biophysical Interactions in Tropical Agroforestry Systems. Agroforestry System 38: 3-50.

Richana, N. dan T.C. Sunarti. 2004. Karakterisasi sifat fisiko kimia tepung umbi dan tepung pati dari umbi ganyong, suweg, ubi kelapa, dan gembili. Jurnal Pascapanen 1(1):29-37.

Sabarnurdin, M.S., Suryanto, P. dan Aryono,W.B. 2004. Dinamika Tegakan Mahoni (Swietenia macrophylla King) dalam Sistem Pertanaman Lorong (Alley Cropping). Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian11 (1):63-73.

Suhardi. 2011. Mandiri Pangan Sejahterakan Masyarakat. KMAGBOOK. Jakarta.

Suryanto, P., Tohari. dan Sabarnurdin,M.S. 2005. Dinamika Sistem Berbagi Sumberdaya (Resouces Sharing) dalam Agroforestri: Dasar Pertimbangan Penyusunan Strategi Silvikultur. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian 12: 165-178.

Susanto, A. dan Sundari, T. 2011. Perubahan Karakter Agronomi Aksesi Plasma Nutfah Kedelai di Lingkungan Ternaungi. Journal Agronomi Indonesia 39: 1-6.

Wang, Y., Zhang, B., Ling, L. and Zepp, H. 2011. Agroforestry System Reduces Subsurface Lateral Flow and Nitrate Loss in Jiangxi Province, China. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 140: 441-453.

Youkhana, A and Idol, T. 2009. Tree pruning mulch increases soil C and N in a shaded coffee agroecosystem in Hawaii. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41, 2527–2534.








How to Cite

Sudomo, A., & Hani, A. (2014). The influence of agroforestry silviculture on productivity and quality of Canna edulis Ker on private forest land. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management, 1(3), 137–142.



Research Article